Study finds covid19 in Barcelona in March 2019 - a year before the lockdown
Covid19 identified March 2019 in Barcelona
Inconsistencies
Conclusions
References
Other blogs on covid19
Covid19 identified in March 2019 in Barcelona
Covid19 was present in sewage in Barcelona, Spain, in March 2019, eight months before the virus was apparently first identified in Wuhan, China. A study by a team at the University of Barcelona found the virus in a frozen sample of sewage dated March 2019. Workers from China were in Barcelona at the time.
If the virus in the sewage came from these Chinese workers, then it is likely that it was circulating in China at least as early as January 2019, or possibly earlier. Covid19 therefore had the opportunity to spread around the world during 2019.
Officially, all the infections, hospitalisations and deaths attributable to covid19 occurred during 2020, and mostly after March 2020. So there is a gap of many months (approximately one year) between the arrival of the China virus in Europe and the onset of a pandemic in Europe. Similarly, there are surprisingly long gaps between the arrival of the China virus and the onset of deaths from it various other countries, such as India and Brazil.
Inconsistencies
We are told that the China virus:
- is particularly contagious
- produces lethal disease
- and therefore requires measures (quarantine and the disruption of mass transport) drastic enough to cripple national economies
The problem is that what we have been told does not jive chronologically or geographically. For example, if the China virus was already present in Europe in early 2019, why did it take a year for the associated disease to be common enough to draw attention?
This means that any increase in deaths during 2019 was not significant enough to ring alarm bells anywhere in the world. Some doctors or statisticians may have noticed an increase in rates of infection by influenza leading to increased rates of pneumonia, respiratory problems or other unusual and more complicated ailments. However, none of them were alarmed enough to call a pandemic.
Conclusions
During 2020 if someone died and they also tested positive to covid19, then covid19 was attributed as their cause of death. However, those who died in 2019 had their cause of death attributed to the "normal" causes such as failure of an organ. This means that 2020 death statistics are so corrupt that they are virtually useless.
Have the disparities in the China virus incidence and timing now stretched our credulity to a point where we must question the validity of medical recommendations and official policies? Of course, the politicians and senior health administrators who were responsible for the 2020 lockdown will never apologise, but will attempt to confuse the data and discredit the Barcelona study. If other studies of frozen sewage samples from other cities around the world amplify this finding, the magnitude of this covid19 debacle will be apparent to everyone.
References
1. Gemma Chavarria-Miro, Eduard Anfruns-Estrada, Susana Guix, Miquel Paraira, Belen Galofre, Gloria Sanchez, Rosa M. Pinto , Albert Bosch.
Sentinel surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater anticipates the occurrence of COVID-19 cases.
medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2020/06/13/2020.06.13.20129627.full.pdf.
Awaiting publication after peer review.
Other blogs on covid19
Have most of us already been through this epidemic without noticing?
Why was the Chinese virus epidemic confined to Hubei province?
Do we understand the Wuhan coronavirus enough for governments to make even the most basic recommendations?
The World's First Iatrogenic Pandemic.
How I protect myself & stay healthy
Study finds covid19 in Barcelona in March 2019 - a year before the lockdown
'NZ Doctors Speaking out with Science' featuring Drs Alison Goodwin, Matt Shelton, and Emanuel Garcia. News Conference, Wednesday, 17th November 2021
Covid-19 vaccines do not work at all and are probably harmful - The Lancet
Covid19 - Sufficient vitamin D is the key for protection & recovery